I have two pieces of advice for any single man considering a trip to Milan:
1. Be there for Saturday night, and dress to impress.
2. Do not stay in Hostel 3 on the Via Ignazio Ciaia.
I am not a man unpredisposed to noticing a beautiful woman. Or indeed many beautiful women. Or consecutive beautiful women one after another, who whip my head gravitationally left and right as they pass; even while the increasingly outraged beautiful woman to my side turns, flabbergasted by my artlessness, from rose to puce. However. Howwwwwwwwever… the Milanese in full battle dress really are something else. On the half hour trip from train station to required metro stop I fell in love at least two dozen times and my heart and pupils swelled and contracted so far and so frequently it’s a miracle I saw the station sign. Everywhere, just everywhere: glossy lips, huge brown eyes, L’Oreal hair, stunning A-lines, classy minis, Prada glasses, glowing skin never too-much revealed, straight backs, clicking heels, and machine-gun chatter into phones or friends faces revealing pearlescent smiles. From fifteen to fifty and beyond, the women of the fashion capital of the world on a Saturday evening really are a sight to see; beautiful, feminine, elegant, intimidating. It would take a braver man than I…
Not that I quite looked the part, having walked for three hours with my full pack around Bellaggio then travelled on public transport for a further three. I just wanted my hostel, or at least knew that’s all I had hopes of, although when I got there any number of bar-side rejections might have been preferable. It’s not a good sign when the name of the hostel is attached to the door with sellotape, is it. Doesn’t bode well. Doesn’t fill you with the anticipatory excitement of forthcoming luxury as does being greeting by the valet under the marble carriageway of the Waldorf-Astoria. (I’d imagine). But there was a bed, and cleanish sheets, and if they insisted on only accepting cash at least that was all they took. I didn’t get robbed on the Saturday night or the Sunday, despite the lack of lockers, or indeed of locks.
Sunday in Milan was going to be brief, I had tickets to the opera at the Arena in Verona that evening, and only two things to see in Milan: the Duomo and The Last Supper. Milan’s small metro system is clear even for a man as navigationally challenged as myself, and “Duomo” station (bit of a giveaway, that) brings you up in the middle of the Piazza right in front of the countless-spired cathedral. This was another lovely case of having absolutely no idea what to expect, and the endless almost fussy intricacy of the spires, brilliantly backlit by the morning sun, really was a jaw-dropper on the metro steps. Inside I was choked by incense – this was after all Sunday morning – and I tiptoed around the Mass to catch sight of some implausibly vibrant stained glass high above my head.
One down, one to go, and I trekked down a side street towards the Last Supper. Or tried to. Got instantly lost, the “hostel” not having furnished me with a map and Italian cities (with the notable and laudable exception of Florence) making no effort whatsoever to inform tourists where they are. London has signs on every other street corner with 5min and 15min walking radii overlaid on a streetplan. Italy, instead, has vendors selling E3 maps, which I was buggered if I was going to buy for a single day. Italy does though also have very kind and long-suffering locals (cross-reference: London) who will go to great length to provide directions to hapless backpackers when asked politely in limited Italian. Or so I have found.
So I arrived at the unremarkable site of the most famous fresco in the world, referred to locally as Il Cenacolo (“the refectory”, ie. it’s unromantically named after the little mess hall in which it was painted) and walked up to buy ticket… to be told that it was sold out. Sold out, in fact, until the middle of next week. Only small groups are allowed in at any one time, you buy a ticket with a fifteen minute timeslot, and you damn well buy it weeks in advance if you want to get in. Or so I was informed by the officious gentleman to whom I spoke.
Now… as a brash and doubtless sometimes grating adolescent I was often enjoined by teachers not to behave as if there were one rule for me and one rule for everyone else. Asked in fact, where would we be? if everyone behaved like that. And while their underlying point – Joel you arrogant little shit just toe the line will you! – might be reasonable in the setting, as a well-trained debater I don’t much like “slippery-slope” arguments. Yes, if no-one obeyed any rules we would have anarchy. Result: net diminution in gross happiness and utility. Bad thing. But if you just let me get around this one rule (and crucially if your doing so does not actively bring harm to someone else), then I’m happier, you’re where you would have been, and so is everyone else. Result: net increase in gross happiness and utility. Good thing.
This is not about queue-jumping, not about me stealing someone else’s ticket or getting off paying my taxes. It’s about the little things, the little if-you-don’t-ask-you-don’t-get things, which I’ve always happily bumbled through life knowing I am usually one of the people able to get, if I do ask, one way or another. Usually people can be persuaded by reasonableness and politeness, sometimes they can be charmed, occasionally and if necessary they can be bounced. I don’t know whether this … trait? ability? assumption? … breeds a little arrogance or if it simply provides me an escape clause that those with greater organisational ability do not require. Personally I like to think it’s charming as long as it’s not over-relied upon, and only on the understanding that it is others’ kindness and generosity of spirit, and not any particular exceptionalism on my part, that allows the trick to work.
Anyway, I wandered off, and wandered back once the officious official was taking a break and the room had largely emptied of other loudly disappointed tourists, and I had a little chat with a charming 40-something called Nicolletta who was by that stage manning the desk. Explained that I was only in the city for one day, that I had been hugely excited to see the Last Supper while I was here, that I was travelling all by myself and wouldn’t take up noticeable room in an entry group… and she very kindly sold me a ticket for later that day. I paid subtly and thanked her profusely – and quietly. Later in the afternoon once I’d gone into and come out of the viewing I managed to catch her eye from a distance and cross my hands over my heart in thanks. She smiled and blew me a kiss.
You would imagine that shopping in Milan would be pretty damn good, and you’d be right. At one point in the afternoon, killing time until my viewing of the Last Supper, I could see two Louis Vuittons, two Pradas, an Armani a Gucci a Farragammo and God knows what else besides, from a single vantage point in the beautiful seventeenth century arcade beside the Duomo. But it was of course the Leonardo which took the breath away.
Entrance to the Last Supper is via a series of three climate controlled vestibules which work as demi-airlocks, each progressively colder until you are ushered into the chilled but otherwise ordinary refectory building in which Napoleon’s troops once stabled their horses and in which, before that, the great polymath from Vinci worked for four years on his uniquely innovative methodology for wall painting. True frescoes are painted with tempera onto (into?) wet plaster, and therefore have to be completed in a matter of days. Leonardo, inventing as he went along as was his want, wanted longer for his rendering of the moment Jesus announces he will be betrayed, and to perfect the sfumato, soft-edged, soft-focus effect he sought. In fact on some days he would come, ascend the scaffold, look at the previous day’s work for an hour or so, and leave.
I’m not a proper art buff, far from it, so my words and comprehension can’t do justice to the work itself. But the truly extraordinary thing, to the layman seeing it in the flesh, is the perspective. As you walk in you are sure, absolutely sure, that the wall on which it’s painted is not flat. That it is in fact painted onto the inner five walls of a cutaway space, with its own ceiling below-and-beyond the ceiling of the room you’re standing in. That the frame around the painting must be of carved stone, the physical demarcation of this strange cubby. But, no. It’s just a painting on a wall. A very good painting – even if it does rather uncomfortably confirm all that Dan Brown stuff about the femininity of John and the negative space between Jesus and John/Mary. I was really quite moved to have seen it, and felt more connected to it than I ever have to a work in a gallery or museum. There was something timeless about standing here where the artist stood, drinking in the faces which had looked out – one resigned and twelve indignant – unchangingly from this wall as empires rose and fell around them, surviving neglect and vandalism and Napoleanic cavalry and Allied bombs. Thank you, Nicolletta.
So. With two out of two Milanese boxes ticked, it was on to the train to Verona and the opera, where an unpleasant surprise lay in store…
PS. There should really be a third piece of advice shouldn’t there: book your ticket to The Last Supper ahead of time. It’s really worth seeing.